Assure L and R(f) extraction Опции

[milan]

Do this features work well?
Can it replace need for EM tool up to some frequencies?

[sergej34]

I have tried but results are very poor. I don't recommend.

[milan]

Is calibre better?

[sergej34]

No, the same story.

[milan]

What is then your recommendation?

[sergej34]

Use EM tools for that purpose. Like HFSS, Momentum,...

[milan]

But sometimes they are too slow for extraction.

[sergej34]

I use EMX, because it is very fast. You can extract very big circuit using this tool.

[milan]

I have red something about it but I didn't use.
There is not enough information available about EMX.
Website is very poor.

[sergej34]

It is great tool it uses fastmultipl method for simulation.
It is 10x faster then others.

[milan]

That is great. But what about accuracy?

[sergej34]

It is not as accurace as hfss, but for parasitic extraction is very good.

[milan]

I have read that it is integrated in calibre design flow.
If anyone has document for integration calibre and EMX, pleas share.

Сообщение отредактировал milan - May 9 2015, 11:09

[sergej34]

Please, share with me also.

[milan]

They have build interface for cadence.
Using this you could simulate faster.